- He-Man Club
- Posts
- Issue #16: 💍 Marriage Was Sold as a Partnership. Many Women Are Still Waiting for One.
Issue #16: 💍 Marriage Was Sold as a Partnership. Many Women Are Still Waiting for One.
The First Rule of H.M.C - Don’t Talk About the H.M.C
Welcome back!
The First Rule of H.M.C - Don’t Talk About the H.M.C
What’s on Today’s Agenda:
🥔 Damn, That Looks Good
👕 The Classic White T-Shirt
🎧 New Song
🗣️ Let The Kids Solve Their Problems
🤣 Dad Joke
👀 Must-Watch Documentary
💍 Marriage Was Sold as a Partnership. Many Women Are Still Waiting for One.
💪 He-Man Life Lessons
Damn, That Looks Good 🐖
@papas831_ Asada & Chorizo baked papa 😋 #fyp #parati #papa #chorizo #mexican
Your Wardrobe: Get The Right White-T-Shirt 👕

Every once in a while, pop culture reminds us that style doesn’t need to be complicated. The Bear did exactly that with Carmy’s now-iconic white T-shirt. No logos. No trends. Just a perfectly cut, well-made tee doing its job.
For dads, this is a quiet reminder that the foundation of a great wardrobe starts with the basics. A quality white T-shirt works everywhere: weekends with the kids, casual dinners, travel days, or layered under a jacket when you want to look pulled together without trying too hard. It’s practical, timeless, and confident in its simplicity.
The difference is in the details, fabric weight, fit through the shoulders, and durability after dozens of washes. Investing in one or two well-made white tees instantly elevates everything else you own, from jeans to chinos to shorts.
You don’t need a closet overhaul. You just need a solid base. Start with the classic white T-shirt, and build from there.
Listen To This Song! 🎧
Let The Kids Solve Their Problems 🗣️
@docamen To raising mentally strong kids!
Try Out This Dad Joke At Work 🤣
I told my kids I’m “into minimalism” now, so I bought three identical white T-shirts.
They said, “Dad, that’s not minimalism.”
I said, “Correct. It’s laundry optimization.”
👀 Must-Watch Documentary
Beyond Men and Masculinity explores how men see themselves, how they relate to the people they say they care about, and how the personal impacts the political. What happens when men are taught to disconnect from their feelings in the name of being strong and independent? What is the link between shame and male violence? And what role do women play in defining what is expected from men and masculinity? From the therapy room to the political battlefield, this provocative film offers a clear insight into why we must look beyond traditional definitions of men and masculinity.
💍 Marriage Was Sold as a Partnership. Many Women Are Still Waiting for One.
There's a video circulating that stopped me cold this morning. Not because it was controversial or shocking, but because it articulated something that's been nagging at the edges of consciousness for years. The creator argued that the financial advice we've been sold (pay off your credit cards, eliminate student debt, invest relentlessly) is no longer compatible with economic reality. The system simply doesn't work as promised.
And here's what hit me: the same thing is happening with marriage.
There's a growing conversation happening, often led by women, frequently overheard by men, and rarely fully engaged with by them. It's not about hating marriage. It's not about rejecting men. And it's not about independence as a flex.
It's about a disconnect.
Specifically, the widening gap between how women have evolved over the past 50 years and how many men haven't, and how that gap is quietly destabilizing the idea of marriage itself.
If you're a man reading this, this isn't an accusation. It's an invitation to look at the system honestly.
The Parallel With Money Is Important
For decades, people were sold a clean, linear roadmap to financial security: Pay off debt. Avoid credit cards. Invest early. Retire comfortably.
But many adults now realize that this advice no longer maps cleanly onto reality. Wages haven't kept up with costs. Debt is structural, not behavioral. The system changed, but the advice didn't.
Marriage followed a similar arc.
We were sold a vision of marriage as an equal partnership. A beautiful union of two people building a life together, contributing equally, supporting each other's growth: emotionally, financially, domestically, intellectually. A shared life where both people grow and evolve together.
But for many women today, that vision isn't materializing. Whether single and dating or already married, countless women are asking the same question: Where is this equal partnership we were promised?
Here's the problem: while women did change to meet that vision, many men didn't.
Women's Evolution Wasn't Optional
Over the last 50 to 60 years, women have undergone one of the most rapid societal transformations in modern history.
Women gained access to credit without a husband, financial independence, careers and earning power, legal autonomy, and cultural permission to self-actualize.
This wasn't just ideological. It was practical. Women learned how to support themselves because they had to. And once they could, something shifted fundamentally.
Here's the truth that men need to understand: at thirty years old, there is literally nothing a woman needs a man for. Nothing a man can provide that she cannot already provide for herself. This isn't bitterness or man-hating. It's just reality.
If you don't need a man for money, survival, or permission, then the bar for partnership changes completely.
Marriage stops being about security and starts being about alignment.

The New Question Women Are Asking
For many women today, the question isn't: "Can a man provide for me?"
It's: "What does this man add to my life that I can't already provide for myself?"
That's not arrogance. That's math.
Women want equal partners. When women date men, they evaluate what men can offer and compare it with what they bring to the table. They're looking for someone who can provide at a minimum what they provide, if not more. And they refuse to settle for less. Why should they?
If a woman can earn, manage a household, regulate her emotions, maintain friendships, pursue growth, and build a meaningful life independently, then a partner is no longer a requirement.
He's a choice.
And choices invite comparison.
Many women now evaluate potential partners by asking: Are we equal in effort? Are we aligned in ambition? Are we comparable in emotional maturity? Are we both growing, or am I carrying the weight?
This is where friction starts.
The Problem: Men Haven't Kept Pace
But here's where the disconnect happens, and this is what men need to hear: while women have been evolving, transforming, and expanding what they're capable of, many men haven't been changing or evolving at the same rate.
Women have been doing the internal work. They've been questioning societal expectations, examining their roles, building financial independence, developing emotional intelligence, learning to communicate their needs, going to therapy, reading books on personal growth, and having difficult conversations with themselves and one another.
And too many men? They're still operating from the same playbook their fathers and grandfathers used. They expect the benefits of partnership (emotional support, domestic labor, sexual intimacy, social coordination) while contributing far less than an equal share.
This isn't about villainizing men. It's about acknowledging a very real gap that's developed. Women built themselves into people who don't need marriage for survival, who want marriage for partnership. But when they look around for partners, they're finding men who haven't done the same work of evolution.
Equality Isn't About Income Alone
A common male reaction is to reduce "equality" to money: "If I make as much as she does, isn't that equal?"
Not quite.
Equality today spans multiple dimensions: emotional labor, domestic responsibility, self-awareness, communication, growth mindset, and accountability.
Many women have been forced, by circumstance and culture, to develop in all of these areas simultaneously.
Many men haven't.
That doesn't make men bad. It makes the system uneven.
Women have expanded their capabilities in every direction: they can be breadwinners and emotionally intelligent, professionally successful, and domestically capable.
Many men, meanwhile, still seem to want marriage for the same reasons their grandfathers did: someone to manage the household, provide emotional labor, coordinate social life, while they continue focusing primarily on work and personal interests.
The Marriage Model Was Built for a Different World
Look at previous generations.
Men were raised to provide. Women were raised to support. Marriage worked because roles were complementary, even if unequal.
For women, marriage was primarily economic security. You needed a husband to access financial resources, property rights, and social standing. Yes, there was companionship and family, but the economic component was fundamental.
For men, marriage provided domestic labor, sexual access, emotional caretaking, and children. These were valuable resources that men couldn't easily access outside of marriage.
But the equation has changed radically on one side while remaining largely static on the other.
When women no longer need provision, and men haven't replaced that role with something equally valuable, marriage loses its obvious function.
The traditional transaction model no longer works. Women aren't interested in trading domestic labor, emotional caretaking, and sexual availability for economic securitythat they can provide themselves. Women want actual partnership: someone who contributes equally to emotional work, household management, financial management, and personal growth.
Why This Feels Like Rejection to Men
Many men experience this shift as personal rejection: "Women don't need us anymore." "Men are being devalued." "Marriage is broken."
But what's actually happening is recalibration.
The value proposition changed.
When women had fewer options, marriage was stability. Now that women have options, marriage must be a partnership.
And partnership requires evolution.
The uncomfortable reality is that many men are being compared not to other men, but to women themselves.
If a woman is already emotionally regulated, financially stable, socially connected, and self-directed, then a partner who brings less than that feels like a liability, not a teammate.
That's a hard truth to hear.
What Women Are Really Asking
This brings us to the question that more and more women are asking: What is marriage actually for, then?
If I don't need a man for financial security, and I can't find an equal partner who matches my level of contribution and growth, why would I choose marriage?
It's not a rhetorical question. It's a genuine inquiry that deserves a real answer.
For many women today, the question isn't whether marriage is bad. The question is whether marriage, as currently practiced, still makes sense.
Women begin to ask: "If I don't need financial security from marriage, and I'm not getting an equal partner, then what exactly is marriage offering me?"
That's not cynicism. That's clarity.
And increasingly, women are making a different choice. They're choosing to stay single rather than take on what amounts to another dependent. They're questioning whether marriage serves them at all if it doesn't deliver genuine partnership.
This isn't about women having unrealistic expectations. It's about women having standards that match what they bring to the table and finding that many men simply aren't meeting them.
The Hard Truth (and the Opportunity)
But here's what men need to understand: this is also an opportunity.
Men who evolve, invest in emotional intelligence, self-awareness, shared responsibility, and growth are not being rejected.
They're being sought.
The women you're trying to partner with have spent decades evolving. Economic realities forced them to become financially independent. Feminist movements encouraged them to question limiting roles. Therapy culture taught them to examine their emotional patterns. They did the work because they had to, and then because they wanted to.
Now you need to do the same work.
What Men Can Do Instead of Resisting
This isn't about blaming men for the past. It's about responding to the present.
Men who thrive in modern partnership tend to:
Take responsibility for their inner world and develop real emotional intelligence, not just being willing to talk about feelings when pressed.
Learn how to communicate, not just provide.
Share domestic and emotional labor without being asked, taking true ownership of domestic responsibilities, not "helping" with housework as if it's primarily someone else's job.
See partnership as collaboration, not hierarchy, being an equal partner in mental and emotional labor, not just outsourcing that to the women in their lives.
Keep evolving instead of settling into entitlement, examining the models of masculinity they inherited and asking whether those models actually serve the kind of relationship they want to have.
These men don't ask, "Why don't women need us anymore?"
They ask, "Who do I need to become to be a true partner?"
The Reality Check
The promise of equal partnership in marriage is falling flat for many women because the men they're encountering haven't evolved to become equal partners. They're still operating from an outdated model while expecting women to meet them there.
The question for men is simple: Are you willing to do the work to become the kind of partner modern women are seeking?
Because the old model is dying, the promise of equal partnership is only real if both parties show up as equals.
That question isn't an attack on men. It's a signal.
And signals are only dangerous when ignored.
Never Forget: He-Man Life Lessons
@saturdaymorningmorals Monday Hero Kickoff Kick off the week like a true hero. Watch. Remember. Be better. #SaturdayMorningHeroKickoff #SaturdayMorningMorals #He... See more